Thottbot > Forums > General > WoW General > Most hated class?

What is your most hated class? (and explain why)

Rogues and other druids, because they can break my roots. Balanced drood, for the win.

I dont like mages, just my opion though they are good for solo and PvP but I dont like how they are soo limited to their weapons and armor, although I like warlock and their the same thing basically. I like them cause they summon demons for aid.

definitely the rogue, as they can stun you and repeatedly backstab you to death as you stand there looking like a complete idiot.

-_- Coconutfury

rogues, if u hav such a high dps, y hide little duckling?

us locks gotta constantly move while fighting a rougue, but in the end, we just dot em then fear, and same process.

Sneaky rogues and bubbly paladins...the wimps!

I have a warlock but when im on my hunter they r my worst enemies, they're extremely hard to kill and in wsg all they do is fear snipe u

@purplepeople/Coconutfury - As a rogue myself, I find that very annoying as well. I've made a macro for the "/flop" emote, and I spam it whenever I get ambushed by a rogue or dr00d. It's surprisingly effective.. more times than I would have though, my attackers break out laughing and fly away. Try it. :)

DEFFINETLY ROGUES because they just sneak around and like attack things esspecially gnomes for me because you cant freaking see them and if you are a tauren its like where is my heealth going.

Rogues ofc i am like stun i years!!!

This post is faded because it has a negative score.

Warlocks.
Warlocks are like the fox news network; even though they claim to be fair and balanced, we all know that's a load of bullshit.
Deathcoil, fear, dots, fear, shadowbolt, howl of terror, dots, fear, dead.
OR
deathcoil, fear, nuke the lock by using insignia, lock dies.
but oh no! 5 seconds later the dots kill you!
~_~

warlock- I just hate them cuz they just cast that freakin fear all the time and drain life/drain mana while their stupid felgaurd just knocks ur head clean off with the 76ft battlaxe.

Gotta be a tie between hunters and ret pallys.
It seems like all hunters get extremely lazy after barely 20 lvls since all they do is send their pet and autoshot ( I myself dispised hunters when i made one and i promised myself never to become one of those lazy hunters who just stand there multishoting for all it's worth and never even glance at the aggro meter, but hey, it didn't take long until i was just like any of them)
The ret pallys gotta go because close to every single one of them suck big time although they themselves think they have the best DPS ever, numerous times have they been behind the party-healer in the dmg-meter. Sorry to say it but these make the good ret pallys, not to say all pallys, look bad...

This post is faded because it has a negative score.

Rogues are annoying, i think the class attributes provide the 'rogue mentality' with the perfect tools to be irritating. Horde tauren shamans are annoying to simply due to their abundance.

My main is a hunter and I sort of hate what its done to me. It makes you simple minded compared to [b]some[b] classes, especially casters. Plus, since 30-40% of players are almost identical hunters, It would be nice if the spec trees were more spread out. For example you wouldnt invite a shadow priest to be a healer, or an arms warrior to be a tank. But with hunters no one gives a monkeys if your BM, MM or Survival since its trivial whether you deal the damage or your pet does.

I wish the hunter trees were more divergent to make us more unique. One focused on dealing lots of physical DPS, one centred on the magic side, lower DPS but with more imobilising spells (after all we are secondary casters), perhaps even some basic healing, and one focused on stuff like speed, pets and scouting.

Whats interesting about this thread is its the same classes: Warlocks, Rogues, Ret.Pallys and Hunters. Very few people saying warriors, priests or druids or shamans.

too many people play hunters, and the pet/auto-shoot thing is easy to automate perhaps. But of all the classes, theirs is the class which is balanced opposite the warlocks, which is the opposite of the light. This means that they have specific vulnerable spots. Generally with both classes you either win or you lose to them. There is no middle ground.
It is natural for fights between warriors to nearly kill both of them. It is not typical for fights between hunters and other classes to end so closely health/mana-wise.
The medium classes are in some games natural magnifiers of skill, but in warcraft they are polarizers- classes which magnify strengths and weaknesses. The warrior, priest, and mage are all specialized classes yet because of the minimum skill required to level them it weeds out the less talented thus giving the class moderate to good players. Other classes do not have this weeding effect and so are more diverse. An exception is the paladin. This character is especially strategically minded for a potential tank. A good paladin provides the best partner in a small group. He is able to attack well until the time comes to heal. The reason some people hate the healer classes is that it is difficult to specialize and get good at healing alone.
People expect healing from a priest. But aside from the understandable problem with playing a priest solo, and other problems naturally inherent in a class, the hunter and the warlock allow players to advance farther in PvE than in PvP. The warlock, however, can be played with a more obvious, power strategy and thus is likened to mages.

amen to the comment above

I have hunter and rogue both 70 (prefare the rogue), before TBC hunters were the best dps to have but blizz have given near enuff everyone a shit load of dps e.g warriors, before TBC there was no such thing as a dps warrior, so i think hunters should do more dps, there gear NEEDS to be good in order for them to do decent damage which is shit.

And rogues are the best class to go, they require skill if used properly and could pwn any class.

i think all classes are good as long as your good at them

For me it has to be rogues simply because they can be such a pain. I play a warrior and reguraly get killed by rogues, when you finally get hamstring on them they vanish before you can get a rend on them. It seems they just like to be jokers as well you know sap you over and over and never touch you, just makes your blood pressure goes up 50 points.

Bubbly Pallys,
Because when there is 1 v 1ng with a pally
hes near 10%.
your still 30%
he bubbles.
Flash of (whatever)
80%...
ur still 30%...
Then he just cheaps it

So as rouges
STUNLOCK much?

its obvious

I laugh at all of ou complaining about warlocks and fear lock. Youre idiots. We're clothies. Do you think were SUPPOSED to stand there and let you hit us while we try and retaliate. Stop QQing. Roll a Hunter or Rogue if you have sch a problem with locks =/

I hate BM hunters, so damn hard to kill. Their petsare insane >.<

I'm a hunter, too, and it's a great class to play, but there are too many of them. And too small amount of priests. Maybe blizzard should control it...

I hate rogues, like any hunter... :D

I like druids, if they're friends. :)

i'm gettin sick of people sayin rogues are to afraid to "face" opponents. all of our skills are designed to avoid direct drawn out conflict. we're not afraid of you. we're just not dumb enough to even give you a chance.

ROFL, i love it, if you asked 100 people what their most hated class is every class would get at least one vote for one reason or another.. no one class is better than the others, thats why there's a selection, if your getting owned by a certain class, learn to adapt so you don't, its not hard.

Warriors FTW!!

grr@ twink rouges.

warlocks

This post is faded because it has a negative score.

warlocks are the shit

This post is faded because it has a negative score.

In my opinion hunter is my most hated class cause
they r the most useless class in groups
they cant heal,tank or dps,(they dps ok but other classes r better)
and if anyone says warriors cant dps they need to stfu lol

Though you are obviously an idiot as the above posters have pointed out, I wanted to make sure you know why. The watered down version:
Good(key word) Hunters are one of the most valuable classes in a group since they provide a healthy source of CC, group bonuses, and dps. Their dps is, hands down, some of the best. In any group/raid I have ever been in I have been top and/or near top dps. All that is needed is some half-decent gear and an a shot rotation.

Official nominate your anti class theard, eh?

I'd assume warlock upuntil now, but i think hunters are on the rise on the hate-o-meters.

hmmm i surpose it all depends on what class your playimg to make you hate another. my main is a warrior so when i play him i kinda hate enchantment shamans.

But i surpose i hate rogues most, cos they are soo weak. people say that rogues are the hardest class to play & you need skill to play them. i have a warrior, mage, paladin, hunter & druid & 1 on 1 with a rogue i will win 90-95% of the time & thats why i dont like them, cos they cant take out much on their own. & you watch them in BG's they cant attack a single target alone they always need back up. they either hang round in group of 2-3 rogues & keep you stunned all the time so you cant actually fight back or they just lurk round the battle field watch other people do all the hard work of getting you down to low health & then the rogue will join in. not a very honorable class. i play classes for their ownage facter & 1 thing i love about a warrior, mage & hunter is that they can take on 2-3 targets at a time & still make it out alive. lol & a rogue stuggles to take out 1 target alone. the only class i ever see rogues actually fight normal & 1 on 1 with is a priest. how ever haveing said that at level 70 rogues do win back their honor i cos there are some well played rogues out there that see do some pritty funky shit. but level 29-60 in battle grounds rogues kinda suck. but then i surpose it all depends on what you enjoy... if you like the idea of playing a class that is kinda hard to play & then cant really do anthing amazing throught most the game & just resort to stealing killing blows only showing your self when the odds are already against some 1, avoiding 1 on 1 as you cant do anything excpt for run away when you relise you cant win it then a rogue is a great choice lol. but if you like fighting with honor & like the idea of running up to any target without takeing to much notice of class & being able to own them & maby some adds at the same time single handedly run around alone looking for tricky situations to test you skill then id say go for warrior or mage. i have both & my personal best for mage was running into 5 targets & owning them all, 3 of the 5 targets were rogues.

This post is faded because it has a negative score.

it has to be rouges i dont get it wats so great about them??
im not mad about them and their stealth its just how there calss is made, except for when they spam sap you -.-
this kid in my school says he keeps one shoting ppl in bgs and im thinking isnt that a little bit much?? o yea for all you people that say "rouges take alot of skill" not if ur combat if ur a combat rouge all u day is take ur eviserate key and jam on it until it breaks

most rouges walk around thinking there better then every1

this is houw wow life works rouges are stuck up and have big egos and most hunters arent that bright

but for all you hunter and rouges and ret pallys that play the way your supposed to god job my life would be much easier if there were more of you!

i dnt hate any classes i just hate the people that play the classes with higher DPS....they are the most cocky little cunt-stains ever!

i was against a rogue at lvl 18 and it was the first time i'd duelled anyone so i didnt know what to expect. after being pwned until the end of time his one comment was 'OWNED'

one time i went against a warrior at lvl 36 i think and i saw him in hillsbrad under attack from three mobs so i gave him a couple of heals and then he won against them. then he decided to duel me....he won and then simply said 'are you serious? so i decided to follow him lol

whenever i normally duel i treat my duelling partner with the utmost respect and heal them and buff them afterwards and if i win, i never go 'hahahaaaaaaaa beat ya!' i always say (even if they werent' 'ur rli good btw'.

i would name the dudes but their probably so up their derrieres they feel like they don't need thottbot.

but the class i found hardest to master was my druid but once mastered, druids are AMAZING.

Gee, popularity has to make it good? Isn't that a bit odd? Actually, I like my disciplined priest because the shield kicks butt with a lot of protection and reflects 50% damage, the improved mana burn is really great, too, not to mention power infussion (which can now be shared) is great in a party that relies on aoe. I prefer to be the secondary healer if partied so the main healer can concentrate on healing and I am damage control. I've been straight disciplined the entire time and mostly soloed. I hardly ever did instances and never pvped until recently as a 70.

I hate warriors they are too boring to play. I don't like to fight rogues but they are great to play.

I hate them all!.... at least when they happen to be kicking one of my characters' butt! lol Every class has its "nemesis" in another class. What I hate are twinks of any class. It's not a fair match up to those of us who level naturally, the way the game was designed to be played, so you don't get an accurate reflection of a player's ability to control a character. But, that's just my opinion. :P

i couldnt agree more

i think it would be rogues,warlocks,druidsand shamans cause they use cheep shots

as a level 70 rogue id have to say i hate paladins the most they are spellcasters that wear better armor and heal themselves

also as a subtley rogue i fully understand everyones hatred of assassin rogues and agree they could nerfed a bit but how many of you out there are complaining about the non stunning rogues

truth be told for me to be truly good at pvp against MOST classes i will have to go assassin and do nothing but stun as well

i am a paladin and i hate shammys im sik of all the orc shammys running around thinking there all that >:(

p.s yes i did get killd by a shammy over and over... but only becuase i was attacking sumthin after afew deaths i rezed at a distance came in stunned him heald myself then used SoC got sum crits and vengeance came into play makin me awsumer (not a word) and when he went to heal bam repeantance (i think its calld lol) he stunned again and i killd him but i didnt w8 for rez im a nice player and besides i had betta stuf to do

i showd him good :)

Rogue, hunter, and shaman. Rogue- will sit behind u all the time stun you then just kill you. Hunter- heres there stradegy, send pet in, conseccutive shot, aimed shot, arcane shot, freezing trap and all over again with the pet hitting you the entire time AND the hunter doing his spells with the auto shoot. Shaman- They can heal themselves, and if your a mage they can do range and take away all your buffs :(

I THINK GNOME WARRIORS ARE HILARIOUS!

I do not like the rouges and priest cause the rouges always have to stealth and then stun to kill.And the priest they dont do any good they just heal you just need a resto specced druid

Okay, just so I'm clear on this. Rouges shouldn't use stealth, backstab, or eviserate. Hunters shouldnt' send their pets in, use auto shoot, or set traps. Locks shouldn't fear, or dot. In other words these classes should not do what makes their class unique? So the Rouge should charge in as a tank, the Hunter should tell his pet to stay and go in with a dagger, and the Lock should swing his fist as hard as he can.

Please....get over it.

BM hunters and Demonology locks. simply because they are strictly a pvp oriented class and thats how blizzard intended them to be. they're op and blizz meant it to be that way. it sux, but hey...whuddyagonnado :P

Warriors get extremely BORING after a while. IDK why. They really only have their sword and shield hmm I mean they just get boring after a good amount of time.

I believe they just mean that the "uniquness" of the class is too unfair. Hunters 1v1 arn't that bad, as long as you can keep him from shooting you your fine, but if its a bg and your fighting someone, and some pussy hunter snipes you from 35 yards away, it pisses many people off. Now locks.. i just plain dont like them. Fear needs to be extremely nerfed.. i fought this lock the other day, i was dotted up, and one fear lasted like 30 sec. I just ran around, aggroing mobs and dieing via dots and shadowbolt, and lets say your a luck rogue, and try the stunlock approach... their insane health prevents your from finishing them off, then the second they get a chance they deathcoil, fear, dot dot dot dot, drain life, your a goner. And if you get the chance to attack them again, their almost at full health. Rogues, i really dont see a particular problem with them.. non-rogues think their OP cause of stunlocks, but you need to be a rogue to know what its like. To stunlock accordingly, it takes a lot of cooldowns, and they can be pretty high. A stunlock without large cooldowns involved is something like 9 or 10 seconds, and thats without your insignia/medallion. Although its annoying as hell when they decide to pop all their cooldowns and stunlock you for over a minute.