dont forget that pallies can HEAL. A quick lay on hands = more mana (usually) and full hp, to himself or to another party member. Now a warrior cant do that.
Warriors generally are better at melee than paladins. Why? they are specifically melee based. This means later on, they have more hpand domore damage (on average). However they dont have the pally's bubbles or heals, which caneasily turn the side of battle.
Pally vs Warrior = pwnd warrior
warrior beats pally to low hp: bubble & heals, and pally hits back, after a while, pally needs to heal again... HoJ and heal, then Bubble and heal, bubble and heal, HoJ and heal. You cant beat a pally with a warrior unless you have a priest, or better gear. That's if both players areequally skilled though... (most alliance palllies are just a load of 12 year olds with a black and white imagination, and who bubblehearth out of dangerous situations).
Warriors generally are better at melee than paladins. Why? they are specifically melee based. This means later on, they have more hpand domore damage (on average). However they dont have the pally's bubbles or heals, which caneasily turn the side of battle.
Pally vs Warrior = pwnd warrior
warrior beats pally to low hp: bubble & heals, and pally hits back, after a while, pally needs to heal again... HoJ and heal, then Bubble and heal, bubble and heal, HoJ and heal. You cant beat a pally with a warrior unless you have a priest, or better gear. That's if both players areequally skilled though... (most alliance palllies are just a load of 12 year olds with a black and white imagination, and who bubblehearth out of dangerous situations).