I've been deliberating this for a while... I already have Cruel Barb in main, but the Shadowfang has a much higher DPS (17.8 vs. 15.5) and have been wondering if I should replace the Cruel barb in the unlikely event I should actually get the Shadowfang.
I have a lvl 19 Rogue twink for WSG, and I decided that Cruel barb was actually better despite the lower DPS.
In my personal opinion, it would be a total waste for any rogue to purchase SF. That's not to say for any other class it would not be worthwhile, but I think the SF is slightly overrated compared to the alternative.
Just think before you fork out 30g+ for SF when this is FREE!!
Lorvec, Frostwhisper (UK)
I have a lvl 19 Rogue twink for WSG, and I decided that Cruel barb was actually better despite the lower DPS.
- Firstly, you can only have SF in main hand (bummer if you want to use a dagger in main such as assassin's blade from SFK) which also means you can duel wield CB.
- Secondly, CB has a higher damage range (30-57) so that means your sinister strike does more damage anyway. the DPS difference may look huge, but actually SF is only 0.1 seconds faster and has a dmg range of (29-55) so all in all I think the difference is deceptive.
- Thirdly, CB gives you +12 attack power which increases your DPS by 1.9, giving a total of 17.4.
The bonus for the SF (+ 4-8 Shadow damage) gives no use to a rogue whatsoever.
- Lastly, the drop rate on CB is about 10% compared with the 0.01 for the SF.
In my personal opinion, it would be a total waste for any rogue to purchase SF. That's not to say for any other class it would not be worthwhile, but I think the SF is slightly overrated compared to the alternative.
Just think before you fork out 30g+ for SF when this is FREE!!
Lorvec, Frostwhisper (UK)